Zionism Kills

Israeli Police Shoot Defensless Man – He Was Tied Up And Wearing A Blindfold

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Zionism by zionismkills on August 7, 2008
An Israeli human rights group has just released graphic video footage obtained during clashes between Israeli troops and demonstrators protesting against the separation barrier on the West Bank. The video has sparked outrage, as it shows what appears to be an Israeli soldier shooting a Palestinian at close range. Al Jazeera’s Emma Hayward reports.

Obama’s Self-Serving Jewish Prayer

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on July 29, 2008
“Lord —
Protect my family and me,
Forgive me my sins, and help me guard against pride and despair. Give me the wisdom to do what is right and just. And make me an instrument of your will.”
– Barack Obama

Zionist War Crimes

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on July 24, 2008

Please visit this website and read this important information.

I encourage you to post comments.

_________________________________________________________

http://zionistwarcrimes.blogspot.com/

Israel’s War with Iran and the Zionist Power Configuration in America

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on July 21, 2008


israel-gas-pump.jpg

Zionists and their allies in Congress authored, implemented and enforced sanctions against Iran, which hinder the ambitions of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies

By Dr. James Petras

My strong preference here is to handle all this (US conflict with Iran) diplomatically with the other powers of government, ours and many others as opposed to any kind of strike occurring… From the US perspective, from the United States military perspective in particular, opening up a third front (Israeli and/or US act of war against Iran) would be extremely stressful to us”
Testimony of Admiral Michael Mulligan, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. July 2, 2008.

“If Iran continues its nuclear arms program – we will attack it. The sanctions aren’t effective. There will be no choice but to attack Iran to halt the Iranian nuclear program.”
Shaul Mofaz, Israeli Minister of Transportation in Yediot Ahronot , June 6, 2008.

“The present economic sanctions on Iran have exhausted themselves. Iranian businesspeople who would not be able to land anywhere in the world would pressure the regime.”
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, speaking to US House Speaker, Senator Nancy Pelosi in favor of a unilateral, pre-emptive US naval blockade of Iran. (Haaretz May 21, 2008.)

“It was a triumphalist conference. Even this powerful organization (AIPAC), the most powerful group in the US Israel lobby, had never seen anything like. Seven thousand Jewish functionaries from all over the United States came together to accept the obeisance of the entire Washington elite. The three presidential hopefuls (Hillary went too) made speeches, trying to outdo each other in flattery. Three hundred senators and members of Congress crowded the hallways. Everybody who wanted to be elected or re-elected to any office came to see and be seen.”
Uri Avnery, London Review of Books, July 3, 2008. page 18

House Resolution 362 received unanimous support from all the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations including the 7,000 delegation attending the AIPAC Conference in Washington DC on June 2-4, 2008.

“Resolution 362 became our chief legislative priority”, according to AIPAC’s website, June 4, 2008.

“The President should prohibit the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products imposing stringent inspection requirements in all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo ships enters and departing Iran.”
US House Resolution 362 introduced May 22, 2008.

Resolution 362 gained 170 co-sponsors or nearly 40% of the House and 19 co-sponsors in the Senate in less than a month.

Introduction

Zionists and their allies in Congress authored, implemented and enforced sanctions against Iran, which hinder the ambitions of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies. Israeli war exercises and public declarations threatening a massive air assault on Iran has pushed petroleum prices to world records. This spring 2008, the most powerful pro-Israel Jewish Lobby in the US, AIPAC held their annual conference and secured the support and commitment of both major US Presidential candidates and the majority of US members of Congress for an Israeli initiative to impose extreme economic sanctions on Iran with threats of a US/Israeli military attack. In early summer 2008, the AIPAC operatives, who wrote this US Congressional resolution, successfully rounded up Congressional leaders’ support of an air and naval blockade of all critical imports into Iran – a blatant act of war. (more…)

Norman Finkelstein – Hezbollah, the Honour of Lebanon

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 25, 2008

Norman Finkelstein, a Jewish American political scientist and author, specializing in Jewish-related issues and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in particular talks about the Lebanese militia Hezbollah and openly supports and praises their resistance: “They (Hezbollah) show courage, they show discipline, I respect that”

On Israeli defeat and consequential withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000, Finkelstein says:”But the reality was — and everyone understood it — that the Israeli attitude was: We are going to knock out Hizbullah. They began planning for a new war right after they were forced to leave in 2000. They found their excuse, their pretext, in July 2006, but there is no question among rational people that Israel was never going to let the Hizbullah victory go by.”

Watch the video: (more…)

McCain is Jewish

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 23, 2008

Palestinian Woman Attacked by Israeli Military Dog

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 17, 2008

Israel’s Ehud Olmert Gives Canada and PM Stephen Harper Love

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 14, 2008

Stephen Harper goes too far with his pro-Israel stance

Photobucket
In a recent speech to mark the 60th anniversary of the state of Israel, Canadian PM Stephen Harper suggested that hatred for the state of Israel is tantamount to hatred for the Jewish people:

“Unfortunately, Israel at 60 remains a country under threat – threatened by those groups and regimes who deny to this day its right to exist … And why? Make no mistake, look beyond the thinly veiled rationalizations: Because they hate Israel, just as they hate the Jewish people.”

Linking Israel and “the Jewish people” in this fashion, raises questions about Harper’s Zionist sympathies and evangelical affiliations. It is reminiscent of the language used by certain pro-Israel US pastors.

Since Harper’s focus was Israel and its 60th anniversary, it’s worth pointing out that Israel is not in fact “Jewish”, unless you consider non-Jewish Israelis to be widgets rather than citizens. The Jewish population of Israel is around the 76% mark. There are also 16.3% Muslims, 2.1% Christian, 1.7% Druze. Not all of the 76% represent religious or even Zionist Jews. According to a 2004 Israel Central Bureau of Statistics study, 44% of Israelis describe themselves as “secular”, and of these only 53% professed a belief in God. Subsequent polling has shown a fluctuation in these numbers.

A more recent TGI poll conducted among 10,000 Israelis reveals that 55% believe that it is important to maintain boundaries between the state and religion. Sixty five percent polled said they felt more Israeli than Jewish. A survey conducted by Ynet and the Gesher organization found that among secular Israelis, 57% would have no problem if their son married a non-Jewish girl. Surprisingly among religious Jews, 13% said they would have no problem with the marriage either so long as the prospective bride had Israeli citizenship.

A recent Harvard study – “Coexistence in Israel: a National Study” – provides surprising information about the relations between Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel. We are accustomed to media coverage that presents these communities as strife torn and polarized, but the truth is less extreme. The findings of the study provide optimism for those who believe in the prospect of a one-state solution. The study includes the following statistics:

• A great majority of both Jewish citizens (73%) and Arab citizens (94%) want Israel to be a society in which Arab and Jewish citizens have mutual respect and equal opportunities.
• 68% of Jewish citizens support teaching conversational Arabic in Jewish schools to help bring Arab and Jewish citizens together.
• 77% of Arab citizens would rather live in Israel than in any other country in the world.
• More than two-thirds of Jewish citizens (69%) believe contributing to coexistence is a personal responsibility; a majority (58%) of Jewish citizens also support cabinet level action.
• Arab citizens and Jewish citizens both underestimate their communities’ liking of the “other.”
• Urgent action on coexistence in Israel is desired: 66% of Jewish citizens and 84% of Arab citizens believe the Israeli government investments should begin now, and not wait until the end of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

The identification of the state of Israel with Jewishness entails a leap that some Israelis themselves would question – not just progressive Israeli secularists and Arab Israelis, but also those orthodox Jews who have consistently drawn a line between their Jewish faith and the Zionist state.

Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum, was a Talmud scholar of the first rank. In his book “Va Yoel Moshe”, he made clear the orthodox position on Zionism, based not upon his personal opinion or prejudices, but upon midrash ( biblical interpretation). In reference to Tractate Kesubos 111a of the Talmud, Teitelbaum states that God and the people of Israel exchanged three vows prior to the exile from ancient Israel:

1. That the Jewish people would not ascend to the Holy Land as a group using force.
2. That the Jewish people would not rebel against the governments of countries in which they lived.
3. That the Jewish people would not, by their sins, prolong the coming of the Jewish Messiah.

Rabbi Teitelbaum was not alone in this view. Many Hasidic rabbis share his convictions with respect to Zionism.

In Canada, Yakov M. Rabkin, a Professor of History at the University of Montreal, is the author of “Threat Within: A Century of Jewish Opposition to Zionism.” A passage from the book illustrates the impact of Zionism upon pure, Torah-based Judaism:

“Worse than the toll of suffering, exploitation, death, and desecration of the Torah, has been the inner rot that Zionism has injected into the Jewish soul. It has dug deep into the essence of being a Jew … It has wreaked havoc among Jews both in Israel and America, by casting us in the role of Goliath-like oppressors. It has made cruelty and corruption the norm for its followers.”

Harper’s linking of hatred of Israel with hatred of Jews is a way of closing down political criticism of Israel by inferring that its critics are anti-Semitic. It makes you wonder what type of close minded idealogue has been elected to Canada’s top office. At times when you listen to Harper, you could be forgiven for thinking that he believes Israel has a divine mandate none should question. The truth is many Jews do in fact question the state of Israel, while continuing to defend its existence. One such group is the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians, that speaks out against Israeli policies they consider unjust. Are they also anti-Semitic?

Harper has taken such an extreme position on Israel that it is an embarrassment to many Canadians who value the traditional role Canada has played in international affairs. The one-sided views of the Prime Minister were echoed by comments made by Alan Baker, Israeli ambassador to Canada. Baker told The Globe and Mail that Muslims were having a growing influence on the foreign policies of European nations, and he ‘feared’ this might also turn out to be the case in Canada.

Baker seems to be inferring that Canadian Muslims are somehow crossing a line if they presume to advance their rights and interests as Canadian citizens. He refers to Canadian Muslims as having “their own values and principles” – the inference being that such values are in some way non-Canadian. Note to Mr Baker: Canada isn’t a lobby for the state of Israel … Canada is a fully fledged democracy and the views of Canadian Muslims are no less valid than the views of Canadian Jews.

It should be noted in the context of this discussion that according to the 2001 census, Muslims in Canada number 580,000 as compared with Jewish Canadians at 330,000.

Some of Baker’s remarks are presumptuous. He said: “I’ve got nothing against the fact that Muslims are members of the Canadian Parliament.” Talk about high handed. Canada isn’t doing its Muslim citizens a favor by including them in the political process – it is their right. Baker appears to be projecting the second-class status of Arab Israelis onto Canadian Muslims – a mistake, because unlike democracy in Israel – democracy in Canada isn’t a front for an entrenched supremacist ideology. When the governing party gets kicked out of office, it’s baggage goes with it.

At its best Canada is about equal opportunity and fair play for all – not about the cultural and political dominance of a small minority, however wealthy and influential. The disproportionate influence of the pro-Israel Jewish community in Canada, and the extent to which that influence has impacted the policies of the Tory Party should be a matter of grave concern to all Canadians who believe that the role of Canada on the international stage should be a broader and less partisan one than that currently being pursued by Stephen Harper.

Harper’s appeasement hits a new low, yet some still can’t grasp the fact that Canada is Zionist controlled. Is the opposition Zionist controlled as well?

“I guess my fear is what I see happening in some circles is (an) anti-Israeli sentiment, really just as a thinly disguised veil for good old-fashioned anti-Semitism, which I think is completely unacceptable,”Mr. Harper said in an interview with CJAD/CFRB radio.

Why is Harper working for the racist state of Israel? YayaCanada, an “alternative” Canadian internet news site, put it this way:

Harper’s blind support of Israeli policies is based partly on religious indoctrination, partly on directives from the US, and perhaps more importantly, his hope of “the Jewish vote” (a prejudicial term if ever there was one, suggesting that all Jews think with the same noodles).

Religious indoctrination and US appeasement(but what is the source of the pro-Israel sentiment of the US :-)) I can buy, but the “Jewish vote”? The folks at Yayacanada must be joking! The only Jewish votes that matter in a country where Jews are less than 2% of the population are those of the Zionist dominated media in Canada. The powerful Jews who own media are Zionists. Establishment Jews may have their disagreements but they are nearly always in agreement when it comes to irrational and treacherous, “unwavering” support of the world’s pariah, apartheid Israel.

Anyone that does not see that Zionists effectively control Canadian politics through their media domination is missing the big picture either through ignorance or malevolence. Politically ‘dissident’ sites like YayaCanada and ViveleCanada protect Zionists by covering the ‘other side’, but don’t reveal enough to actually expose the Zionists.

Whether it is political correctness(unforgiveable), ignorance(somewhat forgivable) or malfeasance(front groups), any Zionist protecting sites should be taken with a shaker of salt.

Even some pro-Palestinian blogs don’t really get it. There is no reasoning with Harper and the rest of the Bilderberg-vetted scum that dominate Canadian politics. Harper is not ignorant, he is fully aware of what he is doing and the powers he serves and it is time everyone woke up to it.

Here is an excerpt from an article discussing Harper’s latest subversion:

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/canadas-ignorant-prime-minister/

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently made outrageously ignorant comments on the plight of the Palestinian people.

<his comments were ignorant, but Harper is not. He is evil.-@>

He claimed that criticism of and opposition to the Israeli policies of ethnic cleansing and apartheid against the Palestinian people amounted to “anti-Semitism.”

“Unfortunately, Israel at 60 remains a country under threat – threatened by those groups and regimes who deny to this day its right to exist,” Harper said in a Toronto celebration marking the inauspicious anniversary of Israel’s birth.

“And why? Look beyond the thinly veiled rationalizations; because they hate Israel, just as they hate the Jewish people.”

Obviously, Harper was trying to curry favor with Jews by appearing more Israeli and more Zionist than many Israelis themselves are.

<No, you are looking at this the wrong way. He is playing along with the Zionist agenda of endless war and attacks on civil rights and free speech. The only “Jews” he has to please are those who own/control outlets like CBC, CTV, Canwest-Global and the associated multimedia empires because they decide who stays in power -@narchore>

read the rest of a well-written article that unfortunately lacks insight into the Zionist power structure:

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/canadas-ignorant-prime-minister/

Jewish War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity in the Middle East

Posted in Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 12, 2008

Horrible as the events described in the preceding sections above (communism, ww2) are, in one sense we are insulated from them – by time. The events are not happening now. They are history. Today, it is too late to hunt down the perpetrators, or almost too late. The victims are largely in their graves, their tormentors have largely joined them, the suffering is long ended, and even the first-hand memory of the suffering has almost been snuffed out. Although much work remains for historians to complete, the rest of us can go on with our lives. (more…)

Barack Obama at AIPAC

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 11, 2008

On June 4, 2008, Black racist presidential hopeful Barack Obama spoke to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington, DC.

John McCain

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 9, 2008

John McCain

Tagged with:

Orthodox Jews Harassing Christians

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 6, 2008

AIPAC on Trial: Them or US

Posted in Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on June 4, 2008

Chapter 5 from the book, “THE POWER OF ISRAEL IN THE USA”
by James Petras

In August 2004, the FBI and the US Justice Department counter-intelligence bureau announced that they were investigating a top Pentagon analyst suspected of spying for Israel and handing over highly confidential documents on US policy toward Iran to AIPAC which in turn handed them over to the Israeli Embassy. The FBI had been covertly investigating senior Pentagon analyst, Larry Franklin and AIPAC leaders, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman for several years prior to their indictment for spying. On August 29, 2005 the Israeli Embassy predictably hotly denied the spy allegation. On the same day Larry Franklin was publicly named as a spy suspect. Franklin worked closely with Michael Ledeen and Douglas Feith, then Undersecretary for Defense in the Pentagon, in fabricating the case for war with Iraq. Franklin was the senior analyst on Iran, which is at the top of AIPAC?s list of targets for war.

As the investigation proceeded toward formal charges of espionage, the pro-Israeli think tanks and ?Zioncon? ideologues joined in a two-prong response. On the one hand some questioned whether ?handing over documents? was a crime at all, claiming it involved ?routine exchanges of ideas? and lobbying. On the other hand, Israeli officials and media denied any Israeli connection with Franklin, minimizing his importance in policy-making circles, while others vouched for his integrity.

The FBI investigation of the Washington spy network deepened and included the interrogation of two senior members of Feith?s Office of Special Plans, William Luti and Harold Rhode. The OSP was responsible for feeding bogus intelligence leading to the US attack of Iraq. The leading FBI investigator, Dave Szady, stated that the FBI investigation involved wiretaps, undercover surveillance and photography that document the passing of classified information from Franklin to the men at AIPAC and on to the Israelis.

The Franklin-AIPAC-Israeli investigation was more than a spy case, it involved the future of US-Middle East relations and more specifically whether the ?Zioncons? would be able to push the US into a military confrontation with Iran. Franklin was a top Pentagon analyst on Iran, with access to all the executive branch deliberations on Iran. AIPAC lobbying and information gathering was aggressively directed toward pushing the Israeli agenda on a US-Iranian confrontation against strong opposition in the State Department, CIA, military intelligence and field commanders.

Franklin?s arrest on May 4, 2005 and the subsequent arrest of AIPAC foreign policy research director Steve Rosen and Iran specialist and deputy director for foreign policy, Keith Weissman on August 4, 2005 was a direct blow to the Israeli-AIPAC war agenda for the US. The FBI investigation proceeded with caution accumulating detailed intelligence over several years. Prudence was dictated by the tremendous political influence that AIPAC and its allies among the Conference of the Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations wield in Congress, the media and among Fundamentalist Christians and which could be brought to bear when the accused spies were brought to trial.

The first blow was struck on August 29, 2004, when CBS publicized the FBI investigation just when Franklin confessed to have passed highly confidential documents to a member of the Israeli government and began cooperating with federal agents. He was prepared to lead authorities to his contacts inside the Israeli government. Subsequently Franklin stopped cooperating. The Anti-Defamation League?s (a leading Jewish pro-Israeli lobby) Abe Foxman called for a special prosecutor to investigate ?leaks? of the FBI investigation, because they were ?tarnishing? Israel?s image (called ?magna chutzpah?). Then Attorney General Ashcroft intervened to try to apply the brakes to the investigation, which spread into the ?Zioncon? nest in the Pentagon: Feith, Wolfowitz, Perle, and Rubin were ?interviewed? by the FBI. Zioncon, Michael Rubin, former Pentagon specialist on Iran and resident ?scholar? at the American Enterprise Institute, blasted Bush for ?inaction in the spy affair? and called the investigation an ?anti-Semitic witch hunt? (Forward Sept. 10, 2004). AIPAC launched a massive campaign against the spy probe and in support of its activities and leaders. As a result scores of leading Congress members from both parties vouched for AIPAC?s integrity and pledged their confidence and support of AIPAC.

Never in the history of the United States had so many leading Congress members from both parties pledged their support for an organization under suspicion of spying, based only on information supplied by the suspect and in total ignorance of the federal prosecutor?s case. Contrary to the bipartisan Congressional support for AIPAC, a poll of likely voters found that 61% believed that AIPAC should be asked to register as an agent of a foreign power and lose its tax exempt status. Only 12% disagreed. Among American Jews, 59% were not sure, while 15% strongly agreed and 15% strongly disagreed (Zogby International, Sept. 25, 2004). Clearly many Americans have serious doubts about the loyalty and nature of AIPAC activities, contrary to their elected representatives. The federal spy investigation proceeded despite Executive and Congressional opposition, knowing that it had the backing of the great majority of US citizens.

In December 2004, the FBI subpoenaed 4 senior staffers at AIPAC to appear before a grand jury and searched the Washington office of the pro-Israel lobby seeking additional files on Rosen and Weissman.

AIPAC continued to deny any wrongdoing, stating: ?Neither AIPAC nor any member of our staff has broken any law. We believe any court of law or grand jury will conclude that AIPAC employees have always acted legally, properly and appropriately? (AIPAC December 1, 2004). Nevertheless a few months into the investigation and with the arrest of the two top leaders, AIPAC terminated their employment and after a few months cut off paying their legal defense bills. Likewise Israel?s categorical denials of espionage, evaporated, as video and transcripts of their intelligence operative receiving classified documents surfaced.

A Grand Jury was convoked in early 2005. As the FBI?s spy investigation extended into AIPAC-Pentagon?s inner recesses, self-confessed spy Franklin?s superiors Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith announced their sudden resignation from the number 2 and 3 positions in the Pentagon, most likely reflecting a deal with the Justice Department to free themselves from further investigations into their ties with Israeli intelligence and Franklin. In February 2005, Bush announced that former convicted felon, defender of Central American death squads and long-term Zionist fanatic, Elliott Abrams, would be in charge of Middle East policy in the National Security Council. Abrams would serve as a channel for directing Israeli policies to the White House and as day-to-day source of the most essential policy decisions and discussions. Apparently Abrams was smart enough to keep his distance from the Franklin/Feith and AIPAC/Embassy operations and deal directly with Ariel Sharon and his Chief of Staff, Dov Weinglass. In April 2005, AIPAC dismissed Rosen and Weissman, saying their activities did not comport with the organizations standards. On May 4, Franklin was arrested on charges of illegally disclosing highly classified information to two employees of a pro-Israel lobbying group. On June 13, 2005 an expanded indictment explicitly named AIPAC and a ?foreign country? (Israel) and its Mossad agent, Naor Gilon, who had, in the meantime, fled to Israel.

Despite AIPAC being named in a major espionage indictment involving Steve Rosen, head of its foreign policy department and Keith Weissman, head of its Iran desk, US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice gave the keynote address at AIPAC?s convention (May 22-24, 2005). Leaders from Congress and the Republican and Democratic parties also spoke, declaring their unconditional support for AIPAC, Israel and Ariel Sharon. The list included Senator Hillary Clinton, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (Republican) and Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid. Based on previous year?s attendance, more than half of the US Senate and one-third of US Congress members were in attendance.

Clearly AIPAC, with 60,000 wealthy members and $60 million annual budget, had more influence on the political behavior of the US executive, political parties and elected representatives than a federal indictment implicating its leaders for espionage on behalf of Israel. Could there be a basis for charging our political leaders as ?accomplices after the fact?? of espionage, if the AIPAC leaders are convicted?

On August 4, 2005 Paul McNulty of the Justice Department formally indicted AIPAC leaders Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman of receiving and passing highly confidential documents via the Israeli embassy to the State of Israel. Their trial is set for April 25, 2006. Franklin?s trial was set to begin on January 2, 2006 but has been postponed. Franklin has been co-operating with the FBI and Justice Department in its investigations of AIPAC and the Pentagon?s ?Israel Firsters? in the run up to the invasion of Iraq and the further plans to attack Iran. The indictments are based on a prolonged investigation. AIPAC was targeted for investigation as early as 2001, while the indictment of Rosen and Weissman cites illegal activities beginning in April 1999.

The Spy Trial: A Political Bombshell

After Rosen and Weissman came under intensive federal investigation as co-conspirators in the Franklin spy case, AIPAC decided to cut its losses and cover its backside by throwing them overboard: AIPAC fired them on March 2005, arguing that their ?conduct was not part of their job, and beneath the standards required of AIPAC employees? (Forward, December 23, 2005). In effect AIPAC was making Rosen and Weissman the ?fall guys? in order to shake off a deeper Federal probe of AIPAC?s activities. Moreover AIPAC stopped payments to Rosen?s and Weissman?s lawyers sticking them with almost a half-million dollars in legal fees. AIPAC does not intend to pay the fees before the trial is over ? not for lack of funds (they raised over $60 million in 2005 and are tax-exempt) but for political reasons. AIPAC wants to see how the trial goes: if they are acquitted, it will be safe to pay their lawyers. But if they are found guilty AIPAC will refuse to pay (citing the organization?s by-law technicalities) in order to avoid being implicated with convicted spies. AIPAC leaders are putting their organizational interests and their capacity to promote Israeli interests in Congress and the media over loyalty to their former officials.

Rosen and Weissman Strike Back

Facing up to 10 years in federal prison, up against detailed, well-documented federal charges based on wiretaps, videos and the testimony of self-confessed spy and Pentagon contact Franklin, fired and denounced by their former colleagues and current leaders of AIPAC, Rosen and Weissman are striking back with unexpected vehemence.

The defense attorneys are expected to argue that receiving information from administration officials was something the two were paid and encouraged to do and something AIPAC routinely does (Forward, December 23,2005). In other words, Rosen and Weissman will say that pumping top US government officials for confidential memos and handing them over to Israeli officials was a common practice among AIPAC operatives. To bolster their case of ?just following AIPAC orders?, Rosen and Weissman?s defense lawyers will subpoena AIPAC officials to testify in court about their past access to confidential documents, their contacts with high-placed officials and their collaboration with Israeli Embassy officials. Such testimony could likely bring national and international exposure to AIPAC?s role as a two way transmission belt to and from Israel.

If Rosen and Weissman succeed in tying AIPAC to their activities and if they are convicted, that opens up a much larger Federal investigation of AIPAC?s role in aiding and abetting felonious behavior on behalf of the State of Israel.

In the almost two years since Rosen and Weissman came into the public limelight as spy suspects, AIPAC has successfully fended off adverse publicity by mobilizing leading politicians, party leaders and senior members of the Bush Administration to give public testimonials on its behalf. It successfully dumped Rosen and Weissman and pushed ahead with lining up the US Congress with Israel?s pro-war agenda against Iran. And then out of the blue, Rosen and Weissman threaten to blow their cover ?as just another influential lobby? working to promote US and Israeli mutual security interests.

Rosen and Weissman?s defense will certainly bring out the fact that AIPAC at no point informed their employees about what the law states regarding the obtaining and handing over of highly confidential information to a foreign power. Weissman and Rosen will argue that they did not know that receiving confidential information from administration officials and handing it over to Israel was illegal since everybody was doing it. They will further argue that their alleged spy activity was not a ?rogue operation? carried on by them independently of the organization, but was known and approved by their superiors ? citing AIPAC?s employee procedures for reporting to superiors.

Rosen and Weissman are taking on biblical stature. According to one former AIPAC employee with connections to the organization?s current leadership, Rosen and Weissman are perceived as acting ?like Samson trying to bring the house down on everyone? (Forward, December 23, 2005).

?Everyone? that is involved in exploiting US wealth, power and military forces to serve Israel?s expansionist interests? What started out as a small scale spy trial, no different from other recent cases, is growing into a major cause celebre, involving the most powerful lobby influencing the entire direction of US Middle East policy. If Rosen and Weissman are convicted and they effectively make the case that they were following orders and informing AIPAC of their felonious activities, it is possible that it will drive away many wealthy Jewish donors and activists, and perhaps put some shame into the politicians who kow-tow and feed at the AIPAC trough. With a weakened AIPAC and its neo-con/?Zion-con? allies in the government wary of continuing to ?liaison? with Israeli intelligence on Middle East policy, it is possible that a free and open debate based on US interests can take place. With a public debate relatively free of the constraints imposed by the Israel First lobbies and ideologues, perhaps the US public?s opposition to Middle East Wars and occupations can become the dominant discourse in Congress if not the Executive. Perhaps the $3 billion dollars plus annual foreign aid to Israel can be reallocated toward rebuilding all the industrially ravaged cities and towns of Michigan, Upstate New York and elsewhere. A move from Middle East militarism to a democratic foreign policy will not happen just because of a spy trial no matter how severe the sentence and no matter how deeply AIPAC is implicated, unless the American public is organized as a democratic majority capable of confronting party, congressional and executive leaders with the choice: You are either for America or for AIPAC. If the accused spies are convicted and AIPAC is implicated a clear choice will be posed to US politicians: Either standing up for a democratic foreign policy or further burying their heads in the slush money trough of agents of a foreign power and once more showing their backsides to the American people.

A History Of The Jewish People

Posted in Uncategorized by zionismkills on May 30, 2008
DATE PLACE EVENT
250 C.E. Canhage Expulsion
224 C.E. Italy Forced Conversion
325 C.E. Jerusalem Expulsion
351 C.E Persia Book Burning
357 C.E. Italy Property Confiscation
379 C.E. Milan Synagogue Burning
415 C.E. Alexandria Expulsion
418 C.E. Minorca Forced Conversion
469 C.E. Ipahan Holocaust
489 C.E. Antioch Synagogue Burning
506 C.E. Daphne Synagogue Burning
519 C.E. Ravenna Synagogue Burning
554 C.E. Diocese of Clement (France) Expulsion
561 C.E. Diocese of Uzes (France) Expulsion
582 C.E Merovingia Forced Conversion
612 C.E. Visigoth Spain Expulsion
628 C.E. Byzantium Forced Conversion
629 C.E. Merovingia Forced Conversion
633 C.E. Toledo Forced Conversion
638 C.E. Toledo Stake Burnings
642 C.E. Visigothic Empire Expulsion
653 C.E. Toledo Expulsion
681 C.E. Spain Forced Conversion
693 C.E. Toledo Jews Enslaved
722 C.E. Byzantium Judaism Outlawed
855 C.E. Italy Expulsion
876 C.E. Sens Expulsion
897 C.E. Narbonne Land Confiscation
945 C.E. Venice Ban on Sea Travel
1009 C.E. Orleans Massacre
1012 C.E. Rouen, Limoges & Rome Massacre
1012 C.E. Mayence Expulsion
1021 C.E. Rome Jews Burned Alive
1063 C.E. Spain Massacre
1095 C.E. Lorraine Massacre
1096 C.E. Northern France & Germany 1/3 of Jewish Population Massacred
1096 C.E. Hungary Massacre
1096 C.E. Ralisbon Massacre
1099 C.E. Jerusalem Jews Burned Alive
1100 C.E. Kiev Pogrom
1140 C.E. Germany Massacres
1146 C.E. Rhine Valley Massacre
1147 C.E. Wurzburg Massacre
1147 C.E. Belitz (Germany) Jews Burned Alive
1147 C.E. Carenton, Ramenu & Sully (France) Massacres
1171 C.E. Blois Stake Burnings
1181 C.E. France Expulsion
1181 C.E. England Property Confiscation
1188 C.E. London & York Mob Attacks
1190 C.E. Norfolk Jews Burned Alive
1191 C.E. Bray (France) Jews Burned Alive
1195 C.E. France Property Confiscation
1209 C.E. Beziers Massacre
1212 C.E. Spain Rioting and blood bath against the Jews of Toledo.
1215 C.E. Rome Lateran Council of Rome decrees that Jews must wear the “badge of shame” in all Christian countries. Jews are denied all public sector employment, and are burdened with extra taxes.
1215 C.E. Toulouse (France) Mass Arrests
1218 C.E. England Jews Forced to Wear Badges
1231 C.E. Rome Inquisition Established
1236 C.E. France Forced Conversion/Massacre
1239 C.E. London Massacre & Property Confiscation
1240 C.E. Austria Property confiscation. Jews either imprisoned, converted, expelled, or burned.
1240 C.E. France Talmud Confiscated
1240 C.E. England Book Burning
1240 C.E. Spain Forced Conversion
1242 C.E. Paris Talmud Burned
1244 C.E. Oxford Mob Attacks
1255 C.E. England Blood libel in Lincoln results in the burning / torture of many Jews & public hangings.
1261 C.E. Canterbury Mob Attacks
1262 C.E. London Mob Attacks
1264 C.E. London Mob Attacks
1264 C.E. Germany Council of Vienna declares that all Jews must wear a “pointed dunce cap.” Thousands murdered.
1267 C.E. Vienna Jews Forced to Wear Horned Hats
1270 C.E. Weissenberg, Magdeburg, Arnstadt, Coblenz, Singzig, and Erfurt Jews Burned Alive
1270 C.E. England The libel of the “counterfeit coins” – all Jewish men, women and children in England imprisoned. Hundreds are hung.
1276 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion
1278 C.E. Genoa (Spain) Mob Attacks
1279 C.E. Hungary & Poland The Council of Offon denies Jews the right to all civic positions. The Jews of Hungary & Poland are forced to wear the “red badge of shame.”
1283 C.E. Mayence & Bacharach Mob Attacks
1285 C.E. Munich Jews Burned Alive
1290 C.E. England King Edward I issues an edict banishing all Jews from England. Many drowned.
1291 C.E. France The Jewish refugees from England are promptly expelled from France.
1292 C.E. Italy Forced conversions & expulsion of the Italian Jewish community.
1298 C.E. Germany The libel of the “Desecrated Host” is perpetrated against the Jews of Germany. Approximately 150 Jewish communities undergo forced conversion.
1298 C.E. Franconia, Bavaria & Austria Reindfel’s Decree is propagated against the Jews of Franconia and Bavarai. Riots against these Jewish communities, as well as those in Austria, result in the massacre of 100,000 Jews over a six-month period.
1306 C.E. France Expulsion
1308 C.E. Strasbourg Jews Burned Alive
1320 C.E. Toulouse & Perpigon 120 Communities Massacred & Talmud Burned
1321 C.E. Teruel Public Executions
1328 C.E. Estella 5,000 Jews Slaughtered
1348 C.E. France & Spain Jews Burned Alive
1348 C.E. Switzerland Expulsion
1349 C.E. Worms, Strasbourg, Oppenheim, Mayence, Erfurt, Bavaria & Swabia Jews Burned Alive
1349 C.E. Heilbronn (Germany) Expulsion
1349 C.E. Hungary Expulsion
1354 C.E. Castile (Spain) 12,000 Jews Slaughtered
1368 C.E. Toledo 8,000 Jews Slaughtered
1370 C.E. Majorca., Penignon & Barcelona Mob Attack
1377 C.E. Huesca (Spain) Jews Burned Alive
1380 C.E. Paris Mob Attack
1384 C.E. Nordlingen Mass Murder
1388 C.E. Strasbourg Expulsion
1389 C.E. Prague Mass Slaughter & Book Burning
1391 C.E. Castille, Toledo, Madrid, Seville, Cordova, Cuenca & Barcelona Forced Conversions & Mass Murder
1394 C.E. Germany Expulsion
1394 C.E. France Expulsion
1399 C.E. Posen (Poland) Jews Burned Alive
1400 C.E. Prague Stake Burnings
1407 C.E. Cracow Mob Attack
1415 C.E. Rome Talmud Confiscated
1422 C.E. Austria Jews Burned Alive
1422 C.E. Austria Expulsion
1424 C.E. Fribourg & Zurich Expulsion
1426 C.E. Cologne Expulsion
1431 C.E. Southern Germany Jews Burned Alive
1432 C.E. Savory Expulsion
1438 C.E. Mainz Expulsion
1439 C.E. Augsburg Expulsion
1449 C.E. Toledo Public Torture &. Burnings
1456 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion
1453 C.E. Franconia Expulsion
1453 C.E. Breslau Expulsion
1454 C.E. Wurzburg Expulsion
1463 C.E. Cracow Mob Attack
1473 C.E. Andalusia Mob Attack
1480 C.E. Venice Jews Burned Alive
1481 C.E. Seville Stake Burnings
1484 C.E. Cuidad Real, Guadalupe, Saragossa & Teruel Jews Burned Alive
1485 C.E. Vincenza (Italy) Expulsion
1486 C.E. Toledo Jews Burned Alive
1488 C.E. Toledo Stake Burnings
1490 C.E. Toledo Public Executions
1491 C.E. Astorga Public Torture & Execution
1492 C.E. Spain Expulsion
1495 C.E. Lithuania Expulsion
1497 C.E. Portugal Expulsion
1499 C.E. Germany Expulsion
1506 C.E. Lisbon Mob Attack
1510 C.E. Berlin Public Torture & Execution
1514 C.E. Strasbourg Expulsion
1519 C.E. Regensburg Expulsion
1539 C.E. Cracow & Portugal Stake Burnings
1540 C.E. Naples Expulsion
1542 C.E. Bohemia Expulsion
1550 C.E. Genoa Expulsion
1551 C.E. Bavaria Expulsion
1555 C.E. Pesaro Expulsion
1556 C.E. Sokhachev (Poland) Public Torture & Execution
1559 C.E. Austria Expulsion
1561 C.E. Prague Expulsion
1567 C.E. Wurzburg Expulsion
1569 C.E. Papal States Expulsion
1571 C.E. Brandenburg Expulsion
1582 C.E. Netherlands Expulsion
1593 C.E. Brunswick Expulsion
1597 C.E. Cremona, Pavia & Lodi Expulsion
1614 C.E. Frankfort Expulsion
1615 C.E. Worms Expulsion
1619 C.E. Kiev Expulsion
1635 C.E. Vilna Mob Attack
1637 C.E. Cracow Public Torture & Execution
1647 C.E. Lisbon Jews Burned Alive
1648 C.E. Poland 1/3 of Jewry Slaughtered
1649 C.E. Ukraine Expulsion
1649 C.E. Hamburg Expulsion
1652 C.E. Lisbon Stake Burnings
1654 C.E. Little Russia Expulsion
1656 C.E. Lithuania Expulsion
1660 C.E. Seville Jews Burned Alive
1663 C.E Cracow Public Torture &. Execution
1664 C.E. Lemberg Mob Attack
1669 C.E. Oran (North Africa) Expulsion
1670 C.E. Vienna Expulsion
1671 C.E. Minsk Mob Attacks
1681 C.E. Vilna Mob Attacks
1682 C.E. Cracow Mob Attacks
1687 C.E. Posen Mob Attacks
1712 C.E. Sandomir Expulsion
1727 C.E. Russia Expulsion
1738 C.E. Wurtemburg Expulsion
1740 C.E. Liule Russia Expulsion
1744 C.E Bohemia Expulsion
1744 C.E. Livonia Expulsion
1745 C.E. Moravia Expulsion
1753 C.E. Kovad (Lithuania) Expulsion
1757 C.E. Kamenetz Talmud Burning
1761 C.E. Bordeaux Expulsion
1768 C.E. Kiev 3,000 Jews Slaughtered
1772 C.E. Russia Expulsion
1775 C.E. Warsaw Expulsion
1789 C.E. Alsace Expulsion
1801 C.E. Bucharest Mob Attack
1804 C.E. Russian Villages Expulsion
1808 C.E. Russian Countryside Expulsion
1815 C.E. Lubeck & Bremen Expulsion
1820 C.E. Bremes Expulsion
1843 C.E. Austria & Prussia Expulsion
1850 C.E. New York City 500 People, Led by Police, Attacked & Wrecked Jewish Synagogue
1862 C.E. Area under General Grant’s Jurisdiction in the United States Expulsion
1866 C.E Galatz (Romania) Expulsion
1871 C.E. Odena Mob Attack
1887 C.E. Slovakia Mob Attacks
1897 C.E. Kantakuzenka (Russia) Mob Attacks
1898 C.E. Rennes (France) Mob Attack
1899 C.E. Nicholayev Mob Attack
1900 C.E. Konitz (Prussia) Mob Attack
1902 C.E. Poland Widespread Pogroms
1904 C.E. Manchuria, Kiev & Volhynia Widespread Pogroms
1905 C.E. Zhitomir (Yolhynia) Mob Attacks
1919 C.E Bavaria Expulsion
1915 C.E. Georgia (U.S.A.) Leo Frank Lynched
1919 C.E. Prague Wide Spread Pogroms
1920 C.E. Munich & Breslau Mob Attacks
1922 C.E. Boston, MA Lawrence Lowell, President of Harvard, calls for Quota Restrictions on Jewish Admission
1926 C.E. Uzbekistan Pogrom
1928 C.E. Hungary Widespread Anti-Semitic Riots on University Campuses
1929 C.E. Lemberg (Poland) Mob Attacks
1930 C.E. Berlin Mob Attack
1933 C.E. Bucharest Mob Attacks
1938-45 C.E. Europe Holocaust

The War in Iraq & the Zionists Behind It

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Uncategorized, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on May 30, 2008

Nelson Mandela, the ANC & Zionism

Posted in Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Zionism by zionismkills on May 29, 2008

I noticed that Nelson Mandela is often searched on this blog. Let’s tales a journey back in time to the year 1999… (more…)

The Jewish Extremist Control Over Canadian News & Information

Posted in Israeli Lobby, Media, Zionism by zionismkills on May 27, 2008

Fullfilling the protocols of Zion was the late Israel Asper, founder of Canwest Global CorpCanWest: A Case Study In Zionist Media Control

daviddukecom-audio-animation.gif Dr. William Pierce Comments [mp3] [text]

In 2002 Dr. Pierce reported on an unusual display of chutzpah, unusual in that the late Israel Asper who owned some 60% of Canada’s media outlets at the time had actually issued a written (vs. verbal) directive instructing his newspapers that they must not print anything critical of Israel or of Zionist policies. Some Canadian reporters rebelled and there was a small protest, unfortunately most Canadians didn’t care to turn off their ball games or put down their comic books long enough to contemplate the negative ramifications that a Zionist media monopoly poses to their lives. A nation’s media is its nervous system, if you ever wondered what the hell happend to Canada or America over the past few decades we have assembled a number of historic reports on this little scandal that document just how shockingly bad the problem of Zionist media contol has been in the past and still is today, also check out Dr. Pierce’s excellent report on this story at the above links.

Canadian Media Giant Censures Editorials Deemed Critical of Israel,
Arizona Daily Star, December 29, 2001
“Canadian newspaper readers are being warned not to expect a balanced opinion from their dailies after executive orders from the country’s largest media corporation were given to run a select number of national editorials and homogenize remaining editorials across the country so as not to, among other things, reflect negatively on Israel’s occupation of Arab land. Recently, media giant CanWest Global Communications Corp., owned by Israel (Izzy) Asper and family, announced that beginning Dec. 12 one, but eventually three, editorials a week would be written at corporate headquarters in Winnipeg and imposed on 14 dailies, which include the Vancouver Sun and Province, the Calgary Herald and the Montreal Gazette. CanWest also owns 50 percent of the nationally distributed National Post, which will be subject to the new directives as well. Furthermore, in addition to the imposed editorials themselves, all locally produced editorial column pieces will be forced to conform to reflect the viewpoints of the CanWest Global corporation. CanWest last year became Canada’s dominant newspaper chain when it purchased Southam News Inc. from Conrad Black’s holding company, Hollinger Inc., for a reported $3.2 billion Can. ($2 billion) The deal transferred ownership of the 14 metropolitan dailies and 128 local newspapers across the country.”

Canadian Publisher Raises Hackles,
Washington Post, January 27, 2002
“Late last year, columnist Stephen Kimber says, the editing of his writing became more and more inexplicable. It wasn’t so much dropped commas or the introduction of errors. Sometimes he would open the newspaper, the Halifax Daily News, and find that his opinions had been removed. ‘I put up with that for a while, then I began to censor myself,’ said Kimber. ‘I would remember, ‘No, I’m not supposed to write about that.’ Kimber had been writing his column without such concerns for 15 years. But things changed, he said, after CanWest Global Communications took over his newspaper and 135 others last summer. In December, the company announced that all 14 of its big-city newspapers would run the same national editorial each week, issued from headquarters in Winnipeg, and sometimes written at CanWest papers around the country. Any unsigned editorials written locally at the 14 papers, the company said, should not contradict the national editorials, which covered such subjects as military spending, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and property rights. The decision provoked immediate complaints from journalists across Canada, who say its effect goes far beyond the editorials, imposing control on columnists and reporters as well. In the United States, the National Conference of Editorial Writers, whose members include Canadians, joined in, saying the decision was ‘likely to backfire with readers who are accustomed to editorials on national and international subjects that take account of the diversity of views in their communities.’ Many journalists say the company is breaking age-old traditions that keep reporters and columnists independent of the publications’ owners. CanWest and its owners, the [Jewish] Asper family, deny that the policy restricts freedom of expression in this way. All they are doing, they say, is exercising the legitimate prerogative of owners to influence a limited part of their publications, the editorials. They show no sign of bending. In a recent speech in Oakville, Ontario, CanWest publications committee chairman David Asper borrowed lyrics from the rock group REM: “I can say to our critics and especially to the bleeding hearts of the journalist community that, ‘It’s the end of the world as they know it . . . and I feel fine.’ ” … CanWest controls a major newspaper in every major city outside of Toronto.”

[Montreal] Gazette Reporters Protest National Editorials,
Straight Goods, December 14, 2001
“For two days last week, many reporters at The Gazette in Montreal removed their names from the articles they wrote. It was a protest against the decision by Southam News to force all of its 12 major metropolitan newspapers to run ‘national editorials’ written at the Winnipeg corporate headquarters of parent company CanWest Global Communications Corp. The first was published last week. Another is to run next Thursday. Credibility is the most precious asset a newspaper possesses. When the power of the press is abused, that credibility dies. We believe this is an attempt to centralize opinion to serve the corporate interests of CanWest. Far from offering additional content to Canadians, this will practically vacate the power of the editorial boards of Southam newspapers and thereby reduce the diversity of opinions and the breadth of debate that to date has been offered readers across Canada. CanWest’s intention is initially to publish one national editorial a week in all major Southam newspapers. This will eventually become three a week. More important, each editorial will set the policy for that topic in such a way as to constrain the editorial boards of each newspaper to follow this policy. Essentially, CanWest will be imposing editorial policy on its papers on all issues of national significance. Without question, this decision will undermine the independence and diversity of each newspaper’s editorial board and thereby give Canadians a greatly reduced variety of opinion, debate and editorial discussion. Editorial boards at each newspaper exist to debate public policy issues, reach a consensus and then present the reasoning to the public. They are designed to be largely free of corporate interests. This crucial process of journalistic debate is undermined by editorials dictated by corporate headquarters. We believe this centralizing process will weaken the credibility of every Southam paper. Last week’s first editorial, for example, calls on the federal government to reduce and eventually to abolish capital-gains taxes for private foundations. Who would blame a reader for thinking the editorial simply serves the interests of the foundation run by the Asper family, owners of CanWest and Southam?”

The CanWorld Chill: ‘We Do Not Run in Our Newspaper Op Ed Pieces that Expression Criticism of Israel,’
Electronic Intifada, December 11, 2001
“The 7 December 2001 broadcast of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s As It Happens [online link included] uncovered a disturbing example of corporate and political interference in freedom of the press. The program reported on a new editorial policy directive from CanWest Global, a leading Canadian media conglomerate, that impairs readers’ ability to make up their own minds about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, among other issues. As It Happens reported that over two dozen journalists at the Montreal Gazette have pulled their bylines to protest a new policy imposed by the newspaper’s owners, Southam Newspapers Inc, which is owned by CanWest Global. The new policy requires the company’s main local newspapers to run editorials written at headquarters in Winnipeg by Southam Editor-in-Chief Murdoch Davis. Bill Marsden, an investigative reporter at the Montreal Gazette, noted that up to 156 times a year — about three times a week — the editorial would be imposed and that the remainder of locally-written editorials would be required to reflect the viewpoints and stances taken by the paper’s corporate headquarters … …[O]n July 31, CanWest announced its acquisition of all of the major Canadian newspaper and Internet assets of Hollinger Inc., including the metropolitan daily newspapers in nearly every large city across Canada and a 50% partnership interest in the National Post.” [The owner of CanWest Global, which owns a huge percentage of Canadian newspapers, and the second largest Canadian TV network (as well as some media venues in Ireland, New Zealand, and other countries), is avid Zionist Israel Asper].

Robert Fisk: Journalists are under fire for telling the truth,
by Robert Fisk, The Independent (UK), December18, 2002
“Let us forget, for a moment, that Fox News’s Jerusalem bureau chief is Uri Dan, a friend of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and the author of the preface of the new edition of Sharon’s autobiography, which includes a revolting account of the Sabra and Chatila massacre of 1,700 Palestinian civilians and Sharon’s innocence in this slaughter. Then Ted Koppel [also Jewish], one of America’s leading news anchormen, announced that it may be a journalist’s duty not to reveal events until the military want them revealed in a new war against Iraq. Can we go any further in journalistic cowardice? Oh yes, we can. ABC television announced, a little while ago, that it knew all about the killing of four al-Qa’ida members by an unmanned ‘Predator’ plane in Yemen but delayed broadcasting the news for four days ‘at the request of the Pentagon.’ So now at least we know for whom ABC works … In Canada, the situation is even worse. Canwest, owned by Israel Asper, owns over 130 newspapers in Canada, including 14 city dailies and one of the country’s largest papers, the National Post. His ‘journalists’ have attacked colleagues who have deviated from Mr Asper’s pro-Israel editorials. As Index on Censorship reported, Bill Marsden, an investigative reporter for the Montreal Gazette has been monitoring Canwest’s interference with its own papers. ‘They do not want any criticism of Israel,’ he wrote. ‘We do not run in our newspaper op-ed pieces that express criticism of Israel and what it is doing in the Middle East…’ But now, ‘IzzyAsper has written a gutless and repulsive editorial in the Post in which he attacks his own journalists, falsely accusing reporters of “lazy, sloppy or stupid” journalism and being ‘biased or anti-Semitic’. These vile slanders are familiar to any reporter trying to do his work on the ground in the Middle East. They are made even more revolting by inaccuracies. Mr Asper, for example, claims that my colleague Phil Reeves compared the Israeli killings in Jenin earlier this year – which included a goodly few war crimes (the crushing to death of a man in a wheelchair, for example) – to the ‘killing fields of Pol Pot’. Now Mr Reeves has never mentioned Pol Pot. But Mr Asper wrongly claims that he did. It gets worse. Mr Asper, whose ‘lazy, sloppy or stupid’ allegations against journalists in reality apply to himself, states – in the address to an Israel Bonds Gala Dinner in Montreal, which formed the basis of his preposterous article – that “in 1917, Britain and the League of Nations declared, with world approval, that a Jewish state would be established in Palestine”. Now hold on a moment. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 did not say that a Jewish state would be established … At no point, of course, does Mr Asper tell us about Israeli occupation or the building of Jewish settlements, for Jews and Jews only, upon Arab land. He talks about ‘alleged Palestinian refugees’ – about as wrongheaded a remark as you can get – and then claims that the corrupt and foolish Yasser Arafat is ‘one of the world’s cruel and most vicious terrorists for the past 30 years’. He concluded his speech to Israel’s supporters in Montreal with the dangerous request that ‘you, the public, must take action against the media wrongdoers’. Wrongdoers? Is this far from President Bush’s ‘evildoers’? What in the hell is going on here? I will tell you. Journalists are being attacked for telling the truth, for trying to tell it how it is. American journalists especially. I urge them to read a remarkable new book published by the New York University Press and edited by John Collins and Ross Glover. It’s called Collateral Language and is, in its own words, intended to expose “the tyranny of political rhetoric.”

Rumours of war Conflict in the Middle East has come to Canada, with Izzy Asper’s National Post criticizing the CBC’s coverage of the battle between Israelis and Palestinians,
Ottawa Sun, January 12, 2003
“The relentless Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a deep quagmire, and Canadians fear it. A recent polling of readers by the Globe and Mail [in Toronto] named Israel, not Iraq or North Korea, the world’s most dangerous hot spot by a goodly margin. Such an apprehension helps explain the federal government’s reluctance to discuss it, much less deal with it: Why jump into bottomless antagonism? But the Liberal government, and the other political parties, may be dragged into it if the Asper media empire has its way. In a recent, frank epistle in his National Post, Canwest Global chairman Israel Asper wrote of his love for his namesake. To him, Israel is a moral beacon to the world. So it is not surprising that since he took control of the Post from Conrad Black the paper has taken an ever-tougher line against Israel’s enemies and, accordingly, the CBC [Canadian Broadcasting Company] has become one of them. The Post now regularly harries the CBC for its ‘biased’ Middle East reporting. Leading the charge is Norman Spector, a former chief of staff to Brian Mulroney who was rewarded for this service with Canada’s ambassadorship to Israel. Spector’s attachment to the Jewish state seems every bit as strong as his employer’s, and if his columns are a guide, the Asper campaign against the corporation will continue to escalate. Last Wednesday Spector implied the CBC coverage fuelled anti-Semitism of the sort voiced by David Ahenakew, the former First Nations chief. Asper, Spector, and the Post accuse the CBC of mollycoddling terrorists by refusing to use that word to describe the organizations which back attacks on Israelis … Asper has previously called for the Chretien government to rein in the CBC, arguing the PM himself was being treated unfairly by the Mother Corp. The Post has just been in front of a successful campaign to have the government ban Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based radical party that sponsors attacks on Israel. If the CBC does not back down, can a demand for Ottawa to make it do so be far behind? … While Asper is a lifelong Liberal, his agitating on this issue is far from welcome. Hezbollah had few friends here, yet the government was reluctant to act. Why? Because it feared the issue might generate a national concern over the rights and wrongs of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with who knows what consequences for our vaunted multicultural diversity. Support for Israel in Canada seems to have been slipping in the last few years as its military might, including nukes, and televised images from the intifada — slingshots vs. tanks — have undermined the notion Israel is simply a noble little nation surrounded by relentless, powerful enemies. Those who accuse the CBC are further undermined by their very staunch support for the Bush administration’s plans to topple Saddam Hussein — which Canadians seem to favour less and less. And it seems to me the notion that Canada must support Israel because it is the front lines of the global war on terror is being more and more rejected in Canada as simplistic, and bullying. Finally, and vitally, the CBC, unlike Hezbollah, has many friends. The anger voiced and pressed by Asper and Spector is no sham. For them the issue truly is black and white. In taking on the CBC and insisting theirs is the only legitimate interpretation in line with history and democratic values, they seem to be overreaching. And it may rebound on them and on Israel.”

Canadian Media Giants Announce Landmark Convergence Deal,
Canada Newswire, July 2000
“[Israel Asper’s] CanWest Global Communications Corp. today announced the largest transaction in the history of the Canadian media industry. CanWest, owners of Canada’s most popular national television network, Global Television, has agreed to acquire 100% of the principal metropolitan operations of the successful Hollinger newspaper chain in Canada, together with all of its Canadian Internet properties, its magazine group, most of the community publishing operations and a 50% interest in the National Post. The merged company will have complete and unparalleled national and local coverage in both electronic and print media, plus the canada.com network, a leading group of national and local Internet sites … With the addition of the Hollinger properties and the 50% stake in the National Post, CanWest will become Canada’s most comprehensive multiple platform media company, with a strong national and local profile in news, publishing, conventional and specialty television and the Internet, as well as in the production and international distribution of television entertainment programming and feature films. – CanWest will have the largest electronic and print information and news gathering capacity in Canada, with more journalists, editors and news gathering personnel than any other media operation in the country.”

Dateline Winnipeg,
Economist, March 15, 2002
“[Izzy Asper is] Canada’s most powerful media mogul … Mr Asper controls the country’s most profitable television network and a chain of more than 100 newspapers across the country, which he bought 18 months ago from Conrad Black. But he has resisted moving the headquarters of his company, CanWest Global Communications, to Toronto, Canada’s media capital. The company remains in Winnipeg, 2,100km (1,300 miles) to the west. As a result, Mr Asper has brought jobs to the city, as well as being a generous donor to local causes. But there is a more controversial aspect to Mr Asper’s devotion to making Winnipeg great again. All of his family’s papers, from British Columbia to Newfoundland, are now obliged to print company editorials, on national and international issues, written in Winnipeg. No subsequent deviation from the line they set is allowed in the local papers, which include the market leaders in most of Canada’s big cities. This has provoked howls of protest, and not just because the papers concerned were used to substantial editorial independence before the Aspers took control. Canada is a country of several distinct regions. But ownership of its media is now highly concentrated. And nobody has as much control over what Canadians read and watch as the Aspers. Mr Asper has strong opinions. He is a former leader of the Liberal Party in Manitoba, and a friend both of Jean Chrétien, Canada’s prime minister, and of Israel. Journalists fear that there is now no room for dissenting views: one columnist has been fired, another suspended and several stories killed because they expressed points of view the Aspers disagreed with.”

Above Historic Exerpts Preserved At: JewishTribalReview.org
(source links may have expired)

______________________________

wlp_hadley-io.jpgDr. William Pierce On CanWest

“Controlling a country’s mass media doesn’t mean just being able to exert a decisive influence on a country’s foreign policy, as Izzy Asper is doing in Canada, and as his fellow Jews long have done in the United States. It doesn’t mean just getting a country involved in unnecessary wars and subjecting its citizens to retaliatory terrorist attacks. It means influencing immigration policy. It means influencing educational policy. It means influencing social policy. It means being able to control the way most of a country’s people think about everything: about race and morality and lifestyles and other countries and freedom and the meaning of life. Most of the degenerative changes that have taken place in America and in Canada since the Second World War have been consequences of Jewish media influence. As that influence continues to grow, the chances of our people being able to throw off the yoke and regain control of our own destiny become smaller and smaller.” … (Journalists and Canadians by Dr. William Pierce 01-05-2002 [mp3] [text])

______________________________

reed_douglas.jpgDouglas Reed on Jewish Censorship

“The censorship department, and that means the whole machine for controlling the home and muzzling the foreign Press, was entirely staffed by Jews, and this was a thing that puzzled me more than anything else in Moscow. There seemed not to be a single non-Jewish official in the whole outfit, and they were just the same Jews as you met in New York, Berlin, Vienna and Prague, well- manicured, well-fed, dressed with a touch of the dandy. I was told the proportion of Jews in the Government was small, but in this one department that I got to know intimately they seemed to have a monopoly, and I asked myself, where were the Russians? The answer seemed to be that they were in the drab, silent crowds which I had seen but which must not be heard of…I broke away for an hour or two from Central Moscow and the beaten tourist tracks and went looking for the real Moscow. I found it. Streets long out of repair, tumbledown houses, ill-clad people with expressionless faces. The price of this stupendous revolution; in material things they were even poorer than before. A market where things were bought and sold, that in prosperous bourgeois countries you would have hardly bothered to throw away; dirty chunks of some fatty, grey-white substance that I could not identify, but which was apparently held to be edible, half a pair of old boots, a few cheap ties and braces” … (Insanity Fair, Douglas Reed, pp. 194-195; 199-200; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, pp. 38-40) Source

______________________________

henry_ford_001.jpgHenry Ford on Jewish Media Control

“It is rather surprising is it not? That which ever way you turn to trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society, you come upon a group of Jews. In sports corruption, a group of Jews. In exploiting finance, a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy, a group of Jews. In liquor propaganda, a group of Jews. Absolutely dominating the wireless communications of the world, a group of Jews. The menace of the movies, a group of Jews. In control of the press through business and financial pressure, a group of Jews. War profiteers, 80 percent of them, Jews. The mezmia of so-called popular music, which combines weak mindedness, with every suggestion of lewdness, Jews. Organizations of anti-Christian laws and customs, again Jews. It is time to show that the cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots. There is a religious prejudice in this country; there is, indeed, a religious persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the religious liberties of the majority of the people. And this prejudice and persecution and use of force, is Jewish and nothing but Jewish.

If it is anti-Semitism to say that Communism in the United States is Jewish, so be it. But to the unprejudiced mind it will look very much like Americanism. Communism all over the world and not only in Russia is Jewish.” (International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922) Source

______________________________

spiro-agnew.jpgFormer Vice President Spiro Agnew

“The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and, with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you’re going to find in the population. By national impact media I am referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS’ Mr. (William) Paley’s Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there’s a Leonard Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!

You go down the line in that fashion…not just with ownership but go down to the managing posts and discretionary posts… and you’ll find that through their aggressiveness and their inventiveness, they now dominate the news media. Not only in the media, but in academic communities, the financial communities, in the foundations, in all sorts of highly visible and influential services that involve the public, they now have a tremendous voice.

Our policy in the Middle East in my judgement is disastrous, because it’s not even handed. I see no reason why hearly half the foreign aid this nation has to give goes to Israel, except for the influence of this Zionist lobby. I think the power of the news media is in the hands of a few people…it’s not subject to control of the voters, it’s subject only to the whim of the board of directors.” (Former Vice President Spiro Agnew) Source

______________________________

section heading icon CanWest Holdings

This page is indicative only.

The CanWest Global group covers –

subsection heading icon Canadian broadcasting

The Canadian broadcasting network Global Television reaches over 94% of English-speaking Canada and like Australia’s TEN Network has not been known for high production standards or what used to be known as ‘moral uplift’.

Major stations include –

CKND-TV Winnipeg

The Global Television System Ottawa

STV Regina

STV Saskatoon

UTV, Vancouver

CIHF-TV1 Halifax/Dartmouth

CIHF-TV2, Saint John

99.1 Cool FM (Winnipeg)

There are other television stations in Hamilton, Victoria and Montreal, CBC affiliate stations in Kelowna and Red Deer, and specialty channel Prime TV.

subsection heading icon broadcasting in Australia and other countries

The group’s overseas broadcasting holdings include

Australian television broadcaster Network TEN (Ten) – 16% voting interest, 56.6% economic interest

70% of TV3, New Zealand commercial television network

70% of TV4, a second commercial network operating from TV3’s Auckland studios

a 45% stake in the TV3, Eire commercial television network

70% of More FM (More), a New Zealand commercial FM radio network with 5 stations

a 90.5% stake in RadioWorks NZ Ltd, New Zealand’s second largest radio group with four national and 27 local stations.

CanWest was the largest single shareholder in Ulster Television (UTV), with a 29.9% stake, from 1997 to 2004.

In the UK it has 95% of Solent radio station The Original 106.

subsection heading icon Newspapers

In 2000 CanWest Global acquired all the principal metropolitan operations of the Hollinger newspaper chain in Canada, along with Hollinger’s Canadian internet properties, its magazine group, most of the community publishing operations and a 50% interest in the National Post (the remaining 50% was acquired in August 2001).

The deal included 13 large metropolitan English language dailies, around 136 daily and weekly newspapers in smaller communities, and 85 trade publications and directories. A number of titles in Southern Ontario were subsequently sold to Osprey Media Group.

Major papers include

The St. John’s Telegram

Halifax Daily News

Charlottetown Guardian

Montreal Gazette

Ottawa Citizen

Windsor Star

Regina Leader Post

Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Calgary Herald

Edmonton Journal

Vancouver Sun

Vancouver Province

Victoria Times-Colonist

subsection heading icon Magazines

Southam magazines include

Automotive Service Data Book
Southam Medical
Auto Vision
Southam Medical Lists
Body Shop
The Drugstore File
Jobber News
Dental Directories
L’automobile
Canadian Health Facilities
Le Body Shop Directory
Service Station and Garage
Rehab Services Guide
Canadian Medical Directory
Jobber News Annual
Pharmacists Directory
Broadcaster
American Mines Handbook
Cablecaster
Canadian Mines Handbook
New Media.pro
Canadian Mining Journal
Mining Source Book
Canadian MineSCAN
Cabling Systems
Northern Miner Newspaper
Canadian Architect
Northern Miner
Combo
Canadian Consulting Engineer
Architectural and Design Solutions
Dental Health
American MineSCAN
Dental Practice Management
Oral Health
Dental Directories
OH&S Canada
New Technology Magazine
Back to Work Petroleum
Explorer Canadian
Nickels Energy Group
Safety News
Daily Oil Bulletin
Canadian Occupational Health & Safety
Canadian Oil Register
Safety Legislation
Energy Analects
Statistics Quarterly
Energy Information Services
Canadian Plastics Directory
Structures Buyers Guide
Petroleum Explorer
Environmental Industry Convention Reporter
Hazardous Materials Management
Les Papetieres du Quebec
Solid Waste Recycling
Pulp & Paper Canada
Ecology Week
Scott’s Government Index
Mutual Fund Source Book
Canadian Source Book
Fund Profiler
Scott’s Directory of Canadian Associations
Canadian Underwriter
Canadian Underwriter
Statistical Centre Magazine
Gifts and Tablewares
Ontario Insurance Directory
Canadian Industrial Equipment News
Laboratory Product News
Laboratory Buyer’s Guide
Canadian Transportation Logistics
Trucking
Motor Truck
Truck News
Truck West
Industrial Sales
Scott’s Directories
Canadian Transportation Guide

New Republic

subsection heading icon film distribution and development

CanWest has followed the traditional path of new broadcasters by buying film libraries, trying to break into the distribution business and developing a film/video production presence. (For Australian experience see writing about moves by the 7 and Ten Networks to buy MGM or other production/distribution houses during the 1990s.)

The highlights are

  • licensing of the Endemol (game show and ‘Big Brother’) library
  • Fireworks Entertainment, Toronto-based film/tv financier and developer
  • Fireworks Pictures, Los Angeles-based feature film distributor
  • Fireworks Television, also in L.A., television program developer
  • Fireworks International, London-based television program distributor

subsection heading icon Multimedia

In the Hollinger purchase CanWest acquired some of Canada’s leading internet portals,such as canada.com and faceoff.com, along with newspaper portals.

Closer to home the performance of TEN Ventures, the new media subsidiary, has been underwhelming, with negative results from online entertainment and leisure destination SCAPE (a 50% investment with Village Roadshow).

subsection heading icon Advertising

Network TEN has a 100% interest in Eye Corp., Australia’s second largest outdoor advertising company, which competes with an APN subsidiary.

Eye has a network of outdoor signage, airport advertising, visual merchandising, and shopping centre advertising in Australia and has been seeking to extend its presence in Malaysia and Indonesia.

2007 Source:
http://www.ketupa.net/asper1.htm

the-heir-to-canadian-media-monopoly-leonard-asper.jpg
Pictured: Leonard Asper heir to the CanWest controlled media monopoly.

Mordechai Vanunu, Israeli Nuclear Technician against Zionism

Posted in Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, Zionism by zionismkills on May 26, 2008

An interview by We Are Wide Awake:

Between 1976 and 1985, Son of a Rabbi, Mordechai Vanunu was employed as a low level technician at the Negev Nuclear Research Center, an Israeli facility which, according to the majority of defense experts, is used for manufacturing nuclear weapons and nuclear research; it is located in the Negev desert south of Dimona. Most worldwide intelligence agencies estimate that Israel developed nuclear weapons as early as the 1960s.

Mordechai Vanunu was kidnapped from Italy for blowing the whistle on Israel’s nuclear concealmant. He spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 years served in solitary confinement. Vanunu was released from prison in 2004, subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordecha…

Truth about Jewish Supremacism in Their Own Words

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Foreign Policy, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Media, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on April 11, 2008

Jewish Supremacism

I promise that this book will challenge you. Its amazing documentary evidence will confront some of your most cherished beliefs.

If you can put aside as best you can the prejudices you may have on this subject and even preconceptions you might have about me personally — you can more fairly evaluate the ideas and evidence in this book. That is all an author can ask of his reader; and I ask it of you. It is my earnest belief that if you endeavor to keep an open mind, what you read will surprise you.

The real power of this book comes from its documentation from major sources. In fact, you will quickly discover that most of my documents about Jewish Supremacism are from Jewish sources. They argue more convincingly for my point of view than anything I could write. I encourage you to go to the sources that I quote and check them out for yourself. In this book I take you along with me on a fascinating journey of discovery in a forbidden subject. I urge you to courageously keep an open mind while you explore the topics ahead, for that is the only way any of us can find the truth.

(more…)

How the Zionists Control the News: Dr. David Duke [podcast]

Posted in Israeli Lobby, Media, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on April 11, 2008

Israel & AIPAC: Lobby For Israel

Posted in Foreign Policy, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Zionism by zionismkills on April 8, 2008

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE VIDEO

Tagged with: , , , ,

Barack Obama & His Zionist Masters

Posted in Uncategorized by zionismkills on April 5, 2008

Have more photos of Obama with Zionists?  If so, please share a link and I will add them to Zionism Kills.

THE ISRAEL QUIZ

Posted in Israel, Israeli Lobby, Zionism by zionismkills on April 1, 2008

It seems nothing at all is virtually known about Israel outside of its borders…. but its horrendous polices are blindly supported nevertheless.

The ‘man on the street’ was recently interviewed in London… watch the following to see the results of the ‘Israel Quiz’…. the ignorance and blind support of Israeli policies is what has destroyed Palestine… it’s frightening.

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/03/31/the-israel-quiz/

Zionism Kills: Women & Children

Posted in Foreign Policy, Israel, Media, Zionism by zionismkills on March 31, 2008

This is sad.  Very sad.   I have no words.

http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

Democrats Pledge Allegence To Israel

Posted in Anti-Zionist, Iraq War, Israel, Israeli Lobby, USA, Zionism by zionismkills on March 31, 2008
Israel Ch.10
Why, America?  Why?